![](\"https:\/\/media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com\/image\/upload\/t_fit_1500w\/rockcms\/2023-12\/231226-ashley-bide-mjf-1425-5bdf34.jpg\")
<\/p>\n [ad_1]\n<\/p>\n
Criminal prosecutors may soon get to see over 900 documents pertaining to the alleged theft of a diary belonging to President Joe Biden\u2019s daughter after a judge rejected the conservative group Project Veritas\u2019 First Amendment claim.<\/p>\n
Attorney Jeffrey Lichtman said on behalf of the nonprofit Monday that attorneys are considering appealing last Thursday\u2019s ruling by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan. In the written decision, the judge said the documents can be given to investigators by Jan. 5.<\/p>\n
The documents were produced from raids that were authorized in November 2021. Electronic devices were also seized from the residences of three members of Project Veritas, including two mobile phones from the home of James O\u2019Keefe, the group\u2019s\u00a0since-fired founder.<\/p>\n
Project Veritas,\u00a0founded in 2010, identifies itself as a news organization. It is best known for conducting hidden camera stings that have embarrassed news outlets, labor organizations and Democratic politicians.<\/p>\n
In written arguments, lawyers for Project Veritas and O\u2019Keefe said the government\u2019s investigation \u201cseems undertaken not to vindicate any real interests of justice, but rather to stifle the press from investigating the President\u2019s family.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is impossible to imagine the government investigating an abandoned diary (or perhaps the other belongings left behind with it), had the diary not been written by someone with the last name \u2018Biden,\u2019\u201d they added.<\/p>\n
The judge rejected the First Amendment arguments, saying in the ruling that they were \u201cinconsistent with Supreme Court precedent.\u201d She also noted that Project Veritas could not claim it was protecting the identity of a confidential source from public disclosure after two individuals publicly pleaded guilty in the case.<\/p>\n
She was referencing the August 2022 guilty pleas of Aimee Harris and Robert Kurlander to conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen property. Both await sentencing.<\/p>\n
The pleas came two years after Harris and Kurlander \u2014 two Florida residents who are not employed by Project Veritas \u2014 discovered that Ashley Biden, the president\u2019s daughter, had stored items including a diary at a friend\u2019s Delray Beach, Florida, house.<\/p>\n
They said they initially hoped to sell some of the stolen property to then-President Donald Trump\u2019s campaign, but a representative turned them down and told them to take the material to the FBI, prosecutors say.<\/p>\n
Eventually, Project Veritas paid the pair $20,000 apiece to deliver the diary containing \u201chighly personal entries,\u201d a digital storage card with private family photos, tax documents, clothes and luggage to New York, prosecutors said.<\/p>\n
Project Veritas was not charged with any crime. The group has said its activities were newsgathering and were ethical and legal.<\/p>\n
Two weeks ago, Hannah Giles, chief executive of Project Veritas, quit her job, saying in a social media post she had \u201cstepped into an unsalvageable mess \u2014 one wrought with strong evidence of past illegality and post financial improprieties.\u201d She said she\u2019d reported what she found to \u201cappropriate law enforcement agencies.\u201d<\/p>\n
Lichtman said in an email on behalf of Project Veritas and the people whose residences were raided: \u201cAs for the continued investigation, the government isn\u2019t seeking any prison time for either defendant who claims to have stolen the Ashley Biden diary, which speaks volumes in our minds.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n[ad_2]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[ad_1] Criminal prosecutors may soon get to see over 900 documents pertaining to the alleged theft of a diary belonging to President Joe Biden\u2019s daughter after a judge rejected the conservative group Project Veritas\u2019 First Amendment claim. Attorney Jeffrey Lichtman said on behalf of the nonprofit Monday that attorneys are considering appealing last Thursday\u2019s ruling …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17222,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17220"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17220"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17220\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farratanews.online\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}